On 08/03/18 16:16, Chris Wilson wrote:
Originally we were inlining gen8_cs_irq_handler() and so expected the
compiler to constant-fold away the irq_shift (so we had hardcoded it as
opposed to use engine->irq_shift). However, we dropped the inline given
the proliferation of gen8_cs_irq_handler()s. If we pull the shifting
of the iir into the caller, we can shrink the code still further:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-34 (-34)
Function old new delta
gen8_cs_irq_handler 123 118 -5
gen8_gt_irq_handler 261 248 -13
gen11_irq_handler 722 706 -16
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index babf81cf668b..84c0043e1637 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1399,19 +1399,19 @@ static void snb_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv,
}
static void
-gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir, int test_shift)
+gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir)
{
struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
bool tasklet = false;
- if (iir & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << test_shift)) {
+ if (iir & GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT) {
if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active)) {
__set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
tasklet = true;
}
}
- if (iir & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << test_shift)) {
+ if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT) {
notify_ring(engine);
tasklet |= USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(engine->i915);
}
@@ -1466,21 +1466,21 @@ static void gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private
*i915,
{
if (master_ctl & (GEN8_GT_RCS_IRQ | GEN8_GT_BCS_IRQ)) {
gen8_cs_irq_handler(i915->engine[RCS],
- gt_iir[0], GEN8_RCS_IRQ_SHIFT);
+ gt_iir[0] >> GEN8_RCS_IRQ_SHIFT);
gen8_cs_irq_handler(i915->engine[BCS],
- gt_iir[0], GEN8_BCS_IRQ_SHIFT);
+ gt_iir[0] >> GEN8_BCS_IRQ_SHIFT);
}
if (master_ctl & (GEN8_GT_VCS1_IRQ | GEN8_GT_VCS2_IRQ)) {
gen8_cs_irq_handler(i915->engine[VCS],
- gt_iir[1], GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT);
+ gt_iir[1] >> GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT);
gen8_cs_irq_handler(i915->engine[VCS2],
- gt_iir[1], GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT);
+ gt_iir[1] >> GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT);
}
if (master_ctl & GEN8_GT_VECS_IRQ) {
gen8_cs_irq_handler(i915->engine[VECS],
- gt_iir[3], GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT);
+ gt_iir[3] >> GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT);
}
if (master_ctl & (GEN8_GT_PM_IRQ | GEN8_GT_GUC_IRQ)) {
@@ -2765,7 +2765,7 @@ static void __fini_wedge(struct wedge_me *w)
static __always_inline void
gen11_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs * const engine, const u32 iir)
{
- gen8_cs_irq_handler(engine, iir, 0);
+ gen8_cs_irq_handler(engine, iir);
Could potentially drop gen11_cs_irq_handler entirely since now it is
identical to gen8_cs_irq_handler, but either way:
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Daniele
}
static void
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
