On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 16:47:00 +0100, Michał Winiarski
<michal.winiar...@intel.com> wrote:
Those two concepts are really separate. Since GuC is writing data into
its own buffer and we even provide a way for userspace to read directly
from it using i915_guc_log_dump debugfs, there's no real reason to tie
log level with relay creation.
Let's create a separate debugfs, giving userspace a way to create a
relay on demand, when it wants to read a continuous log rather than a
snapshot.
v2: Don't touch guc_log_level on relay creation error, adjust locking
after rebase, s/dev_priv/i915, pass guc to file->private_data (Sagar)
Use struct_mutex rather than runtime.lock for set_log_level
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
---
/snip/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index 90d2f38e22c9..abce0e38528a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -219,28 +219,6 @@ static void guc_free_load_err_log(struct intel_guc
*guc)
i915_gem_object_put(guc->load_err_log);
}
-int intel_uc_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
-{
- int ret = 0;
-
- if (!USES_GUC(i915))
- return 0;
-
- if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
- ret = intel_guc_log_register(&i915->guc);
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-void intel_uc_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
-{
- if (!USES_GUC(i915))
- return;
-
- if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
- intel_guc_log_unregister(&i915->guc);
-}
-
static int guc_enable_communication(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
index d6af984cd789..f76d51d1ce70 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@
void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
-int intel_uc_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
-void intel_uc_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
hmm, it looks that timelines of these two functions were very short
(from patch 2 till patch 8) - so maybe by doing some patch re-order
can we fully skip them ?
void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
int intel_uc_init_misc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
