On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:42:40AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On bxt, we see that the rc6 subtest flip-flops as RC6 does not restart
> within our desired interval. Improve the likelihood of the inspection
> passing by idling the GPU and waiting for 2 Evaluation Intervals before
> we start polling of RC6 residency.
I'd stick with pure gem_quiescent_gpu() since we're already polling for waay
longer than that.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
-Michał
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/gem_mocs_settings.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_mocs_settings.c b/tests/gem_mocs_settings.c
> index 9705fbfd..85fd637a 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_mocs_settings.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_mocs_settings.c
> @@ -336,12 +336,15 @@ static uint32_t rc6_residency(int dir)
>
> static void rc6_wait(int fd)
> {
> - int sysfs;
> uint32_t residency;
> + int sysfs;
>
> sysfs = igt_sysfs_open(fd, NULL);
> igt_assert_lte(0, sysfs);
>
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> + usleep(320e3); /* Wait for 2 EIs before polling; should now be active */
> +
> residency = rc6_residency(sysfs);
> igt_require(igt_wait(rc6_residency(sysfs) != residency, 10000, 2));
>
> --
> 2.16.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
