On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> wrote: > Hi, > I've been working on a getfb2[0] ioctl, which amongst other things > supports multi-planar framebuffers as well as modifiers. getfb > currently calls the framebuffer's handle_create hook, which doesn't > support multiple planes. > > Thanks to Noralf's recent work, drivers can just store GEM objects > directly in drm_framebuffer. I use this directly in getfb2: we need > direct access to the GEM objects and not a vfunc in order to not hand > out duplicate GEM names for the same object. > > This series converts all drivers except for nouveau, which was a > little too non-trivial for my comfort, to storing GEM objects directly > in drm_framebuffer. For those drivers whose driver_framebuffer struct > was nothing but drm_framebuffer + BO, it deletes the driver-specific > struct. It also makes use of Noralf's generic framebuffer helpers for > create_handle and destroy where possible. > > I don't have the hardware for most of these drivers, so have had to > settle for just staring really hard at the diff. > > I intend to remove create_handle when all drivers are converted over > to placing BOs directly inside drm_framebuffer. For most drivers > there's a relatively easy conversion to using the helpers for > basically all framebuffer handling and fbdev emulation as well, though > that's a bit further than I was willing to go without hardware to test > on ...
Series is: Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > > Cheers, > Daniel > > [0]: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-March/170512.html > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
