On Fri, 06 Apr 2018 17:51:44 +0200, Chris Wilson
<ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
We will want to park GEM before disengaging the drive^W^W^W unwedging.
Since we already do the work for idling, expose the guts as a new
function that we can then reuse.
v2: Just skip if already parked; makes it more forgiving to use by
future callers.
v3: Extract mark_busy, rename it to i915_gem_unpark and place it next to
i915_gem_park so that we can evaluate it for symmetry more easily.
Calling GEM from inside i915_request looks to be a bit of a layering
violation, for the moment I am imaging them as being notify_cb.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> #v1
---
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
/michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
