On 4/9/2018 5:53 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
By calling i915_gem_init_hw in i915_gem_resume and not calling
i915_gem_fini_hw in i915_gem_suspend we introduced asymmetry
in init_hw/fini_hw calls. Let's fix that.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 6f71099..ceec5a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -5061,6 +5061,7 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
* machines is a good idea, we don't - just in case it leaves the
* machine in an unusable condition.
*/
+ i915_gem_fini_hw(dev_priv);
intel_uc_sanitize(dev_priv);
i915_gem_sanitize(dev_priv);
--
Thanks,
Sagar
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
