On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 15:27 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> IGT tests could be improved with sink status, knowing for sure that
> hardware have activate or exit PSR.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> No changes since v2, Dhinakaran asked to not merge this patch in v2
> because reading i915_edp_psr_status was causing PSR to exit but now
> with 'drm/i915/psr: Prevent PSR exit when a non-pipe related register
> is written' it is fixed.
> 

Do you mind adding "reading i915_edp_psr_status was causing PSR to exit
but now with 'drm/i915/psr: Prevent PSR exit when a non-pipe related
register is written' it is fixed." to the commit message?



>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 2f05f5262bba..536d93322451 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2603,6 +2603,26 @@ static const char *psr2_live_status(u32 val)
>       return "unknown";
>  }
>  
> +static const char *psr_sink_status(u8 val)
> +{
> +     static const char * const sink_status[] = {
> +             "inactive",
> +             "transition to active, capture and display",
> +             "active, display from RFB",
> +             "active, capture and display on sink device timings",
> +             "transition to inactive, capture and display, timing re-sync",
> +             "reserved",
> +             "reserved",
> +             "sink internal error"
> +     };
> +
> +     val &= DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
> +     if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(sink_status))
> +             return sink_status[val];
> +
> +     return "unknown";
> +}
> +
>  static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> @@ -2684,6 +2704,15 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, 
> void *data)
>               seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR2_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
>                          psr2, psr2_live_status(psr2));
>       }
> +
> +     if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> +             struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &dev_priv->psr.enabled->aux;
> +             u8 val;
> +
> +             if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) == 1)
> +                     seq_printf(m, "Sink PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n", val,
> +                                psr_sink_status(val));
> +     }
>       mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  
>       if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->psr.debug)) {

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to