Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-05-14 11:43:44)
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-05-12 09:49:57)
> > When we process the outstanding requests upon banning a context, we need
> > to acquire both the engine and the client's timeline, nesting the locks.
> > This requires explicit markup as the two timelines are now of the same
> > class, since commit a89d1f921c15 ("drm/i915: Split i915_gem_timeline into
> > individual timelines").
> > 
> > Testcase: igt/gem_eio/banned
> > Fixes: a89d1f921c15 ("drm/i915: Split i915_gem_timeline into individual 
> > timelines")
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
> 
> [from resend]
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

And pushed, thanks for the review. Will push the test case once CI has
updated to the new drm-tip.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to