Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-24 16:04:46) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > Instead of using the engine->id, use uabi_class:instance pairs in trace- > points including engine info.
Should we not pack dev,hw_id,class,instance into u16s? > This will be more readable, more future proof and more stable for > userspace consumption. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: svetlana.kukan...@intel.com > --- > @@ -616,7 +621,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_queue, > TP_STRUCT__entry( > __field(u32, dev) > __field(u32, hw_id) > - __field(u32, ring) > + __field(u32, class) > + __field(u32, instance) > __field(u32, ctx) ctx needs u64 :( I've no objection to switching to our hopefully futureproof uabi nomenclature. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
