Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-25 09:26:42) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > Underlaying field is u64 so the tracepoint needs to be as well. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 20 ++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h > index bac582ed3a0b..009862261218 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h > @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_queue, > __field(u32, hw_id) > __field(u16, class) > __field(u16, instance) > - __field(u32, ctx) > + __field(u64, ctx)
Hmm, we have a hole before the u64 if my counting is correct. Hmm, hw_id is more related to the global seqno wouldn't you say? :) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
