On 30/05/18 03:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
As we measure the ring size, we never expect to find we can not submit
no batches at all. Assert against the unexpected.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenzi...@intel.com>
---
lib/i915/gem_ring.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/i915/gem_ring.c b/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
index 10d2f2cd4..7d64165eb 100644
--- a/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
+++ b/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ __gem_measure_ring_inflight(int fd, unsigned int engine,
enum measure_ring_flags
} while (1);
igt_assert_eq(__execbuf(fd, &execbuf), -EINTR);
+ igt_assert(count);
Maybe a courtesy print?
With or without,
Reviewed-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenzi...@intel.com>
memset(&itv, 0, sizeof(itv));
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &itv, NULL);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
