Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-06-15 08:16:01) > Quoting Patchwork (2018-06-14 23:53:30) > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9+ systems. > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44781/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4322 -> Patchwork_9312 = > > > > == Summary - FAILURE == > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9312 absolutely need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_9312, please notify your bug team to allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in > > CI. > > > > External URL: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/44781/revisions/1/mbox/ > > > > == Possible new issues == > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > Patchwork_9312: > > > > === IGT changes === > > > > ==== Possible regressions ==== > > > > igt@gem_workarounds@basic-read: > > fi-skl-6260u: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-cfl-s3: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-skl-6700k2: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-skl-6770hq: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-kbl-7560u: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-skl-6600u: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-bxt-dsi: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-kbl-guc: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-kbl-7500u: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-skl-6700hq: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-bxt-j4205: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-skl-gvtdvm: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-cfl-guc: PASS -> FAIL > > {fi-whl-u}: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-cfl-8700k: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-glk-j4005: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-skl-guc: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-kbl-7567u: PASS -> FAIL > > fi-kbl-r: PASS -> FAIL > > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: Address val mask read > result > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07014 0x20002000 0x00002000 > 0x00002000 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E194 0x01000100 0x00000100 > 0x00000114 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E4F0 0x81008100 0x00008100 > 0xFFFF8120 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E184 0x00200020 0x00000020 > 0x00000022 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E194 0x00140014 0x00000014 > 0x00000114 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07004 0x00420042 0x00000042 > 0x000029C2 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E188 0x00080000 0x00000008 > 0x00008030 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07300 0x80208020 0x00008020 > 0x00008830 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07300 0x00100010 0x00000010 > 0x00008830 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E184 0x00020002 0x00000002 > 0x00000022 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E180 0x20002000 0x00002000 > 0x00002000 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x02580 0x00010000 0x00000001 > 0x00000004 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x02580 0x00060004 0x00000006 > 0x00000004 OK > (gem_workarounds:3828) WARNING: 0x02088 0x00020002 0x00000002 > 0x00000000 FAIL > (gem_workarounds:3828) WARNING: 0x02090 0x10001000 0x00001000 > 0x00000000 FAIL > > The 2 writes didn't stick. Not context saved? Or something even more > peculiar?
More sinister. The LRI never expected so many registers! -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
