i915g has a slightly different tiling layout, and so requires a
different reference swizzle pattern.
Testcase: igt/drv_selftests/live_objects #gdg
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
index 25c2b2d433bd..f4a5099c75b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -169,9 +169,16 @@ static u64 tiled_offset(const struct tile *tile, u64 v)
v += y * tile->width;
v += div64_u64_rem(x, tile->width, &x) << tile->size;
v += x;
- } else {
+ } else if (tile->width == 128) {
const unsigned int ytile_span = 16;
- const unsigned int ytile_height = 32 * ytile_span;
+ const unsigned int ytile_height = 512;
+
+ v += y * ytile_span;
+ v += div64_u64_rem(x, ytile_span, &x) * ytile_height;
+ v += x;
+ } else {
+ const unsigned int ytile_span = 32;
+ const unsigned int ytile_height = 256;
v += y * ytile_span;
v += div64_u64_rem(x, ytile_span, &x) * ytile_height;
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
