Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-09-18 11:02:09) > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-09-18 10:59:11) > > > > On 18/09/2018 10:44, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-09-18 10:38:44) > > >> Can I say it is testing the i915_execbuffer2_set_context_id as well by > > >> knowing underlying ABI field is 64-bit wide and keep the r-b? (No trash > > >> in unused part of rsvd1.) > > > > > > The field isn't 64-bit wide, so the test would be misleading > > > unfortunately. > > > > rsvd1? It is 64-bit in i915_drm.h I am looking at. And ABI is free to > > set it directly. > > > > But true, it seems we are not checking for trash in upper 32-bits in > > execbuf paths.. :( > > > > So this means regardless of what helper does the ABI is actually 64-bit. > > So test should actually bypass the helper I think and set rsvd1 directly > > I think. And keep the 64-bit invalid values. > > We are not checking 64b. Think of one value that invalidates the test.
We can construct more values that would fail if we create a few contexts and destroy them testing that that are invalid after use. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
