Did the patch this references get pushed? I saw it fly by and I thought we had
decided not to pull it in
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 00:20 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> commit '3cf71bc9904d ("drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check,
> unconditionally during long pulse"")' applies a work around for monitors
> that don't signal link loss. Limit this only for external displays as
> eDP features like PSR when active will have the link turned off and the
> driver ends up retraining the link seeeing that link is not synchronized.
>
> Cc: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jan-Marek Glogowski <glo...@fbihome.de>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> References: 3cf71bc9904d ("drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check,
> unconditionally during long pulse"")
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index cac1c7c6cbfd..8bf9afa5683c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -5072,7 +5072,9 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *connector,
> */
> status = connector_status_disconnected;
> goto out;
> - } else {
> + }
> +
> + if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> /*
> * Some monitors do not signal loss of link synchronization
> * with an IRQ_HPD, so force a link status check.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
