On 10/29/2018 04:00 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
CNL A stepping was the only affected there. But also it is time to clean old pre-production CNL Workarounds, so let's just remove and clean this W/A. Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index c3cadc09f859..dd88ffe9e273 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -5242,8 +5242,8 @@ static bool needs_nv12_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) return false;- if ((IS_GEN9(dev_priv) && !IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) ||- IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) + /* WA Display #0827: Gen9:all */ + if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv) && !IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) return true;return false;
Looks good. Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
