On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 23:29 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT > > bit to > > be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo. > > It's not a type. We're just preserving MOT. What makes you think it > should always be set? > The table defining request commands (2-148) has the MOT bit set for Write_Status_Update_Request, doesn't make it look like an option when querying the status. Checking the callers again, I see that we could get a defer when ending an i2c transaction and that will require a Write_Status_Update_Request with MOT unset. Sorry for the noise.
> > > > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > Fixes: 68ec2a2a2481 ("drm/dp: Use I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE to drain > > partial I2C_WRITE requests") > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > index 2d6c491a0542..d98805b517f0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void > > drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg) > > * rest of the message > > */ > > if ((msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) == DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE) { > > - msg->request &= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT; > > + msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT; > > msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE; > > } > > } > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx