This has been discussed elsewhere, but I summarize here for
transparency:

This makes some of the display registers take the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE path
in reg reads and writes, breaking things. Rebased on top of recent
drm-intel-next-queued with Ville's IS_DISPLAYREG nuking commits this
works all right, though.

BR,
Jani.


On Sat, 02 Feb 2013, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 13b9b4f..b35b479 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ static const struct intel_device_info 
> intel_valleyview_m_info = {
>       .has_bsd_ring = 1,
>       .has_blt_ring = 1,
>       .is_valleyview = 1,
> +     .has_force_wake = 1,
> +     .has_llc = 0,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct intel_device_info intel_valleyview_d_info = {
> @@ -285,6 +287,8 @@ static const struct intel_device_info 
> intel_valleyview_d_info = {
>       .has_bsd_ring = 1,
>       .has_blt_ring = 1,
>       .is_valleyview = 1,
> +     .has_force_wake = 1,
> +     .has_llc = 0,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct intel_device_info intel_haswell_d_info = {
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to