From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

skl_needs_memory_bw_wa() doesn't look at the passed in state at all.
Possibly it should, but for now let's make life simpler by just
passing in dev_priv.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 21 +++++----------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 7464552c05f4..40cb18c61e11 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3633,14 +3633,9 @@ static u8 intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  * FIXME: We still don't have the proper code detect if we need to apply the 
WA,
  * so assume we'll always need it in order to avoid underruns.
  */
-static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
-
-       if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
-               return true;
-
-       return false;
+       return IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv);
 }
 
 static bool
@@ -3792,7 +3787,7 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 
                latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
 
-               if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(intel_state) &&
+               if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(dev_priv) &&
                    plane->base.state->fb->modifier ==
                    I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED)
                        latency += 15;
@@ -4580,9 +4575,6 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state 
*cstate,
        const struct drm_plane_state *pstate = &intel_pstate->base;
        const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = pstate->fb;
        uint32_t interm_pbpl;
-       struct intel_atomic_state *state =
-               to_intel_atomic_state(cstate->base.state);
-       bool apply_memory_bw_wa = skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(state);
 
        /* only NV12 format has two planes */
        if (color_plane == 1 && fb->format->format != DRM_FORMAT_NV12) {
@@ -4643,7 +4635,7 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state 
*cstate,
                wp->y_min_scanlines = 4;
        }
 
-       if (apply_memory_bw_wa)
+       if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(dev_priv))
                wp->y_min_scanlines *= 2;
 
        wp->plane_bytes_per_line = wp->width * wp->cpp;
@@ -4697,9 +4689,6 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct 
intel_crtc_state *cstate,
        uint_fixed_16_16_t method1, method2;
        uint_fixed_16_16_t selected_result;
        uint32_t res_blocks, res_lines, min_ddb_alloc = 0;
-       struct intel_atomic_state *state =
-               to_intel_atomic_state(cstate->base.state);
-       bool apply_memory_bw_wa = skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(state);
 
        if (latency == 0)
                return;
@@ -4710,7 +4699,7 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct 
intel_crtc_state *cstate,
            dev_priv->ipc_enabled)
                latency += 4;
 
-       if (apply_memory_bw_wa && wp->x_tiled)
+       if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(dev_priv) && wp->x_tiled)
                latency += 15;
 
        method1 = skl_wm_method1(dev_priv, wp->plane_pixel_rate,
-- 
2.19.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to