On 1/21/2019 14:20, Chris Wilson wrote:
Always perform the requested reset, even if we believe the engine is
idle. Presumably there was a reason the caller wanted the reset, and in
the near future we lose the easy tracking for whether the engine is
idle.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reset.c             |  4 ----
  .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c  | 22 +++++--------------
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reset.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reset.c
index 064fc6da1512..d44b095e2860 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reset.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reset.c
@@ -1063,10 +1063,6 @@ int i915_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, 
const char *msg)
        GEM_TRACE("%s flags=%lx\n", engine->name, error->flags);
        GEM_BUG_ON(!test_bit(I915_RESET_ENGINE + engine->id, &error->flags));
- if (i915_seqno_passed(intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
-                             intel_engine_last_submit(engine)))
-               return 0;
-
        reset_prepare_engine(engine);
if (msg)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c
index 8025c7e0bf6c..2c38ea5892d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c
@@ -449,8 +449,6 @@ static int __igt_reset_engine(struct drm_i915_private 
*i915, bool active)
set_bit(I915_RESET_ENGINE + id, &i915->gpu_error.flags);
                do {
-                       u32 seqno = intel_engine_get_seqno(engine);
-
                        if (active) {
                                struct i915_request *rq;
@@ -479,8 +477,6 @@ static int __igt_reset_engine(struct drm_i915_private *i915, bool active)
                                        break;
                                }
- GEM_BUG_ON(!rq->global_seqno);
-                               seqno = rq->global_seqno - 1;
AFAICT this saved seqno value was never used anyway? It only exists inside the loop, was only used in a pr_err earlier in the loop, and the start of the loop always (re-)initialises it. Or am I missing some hidden macro magic somewhere?


                                i915_request_put(rq);
                        }
@@ -496,11 +492,10 @@ static int __igt_reset_engine(struct drm_i915_private *i915, bool active)
                                break;
                        }
- reset_engine_count += active;
                        if (i915_reset_engine_count(&i915->gpu_error, engine) !=
-                           reset_engine_count) {
-                               pr_err("%s engine reset %srecorded!\n",
-                                      engine->name, active ? "not " : "");
+                           ++reset_engine_count) {
+                               pr_err("%s engine reset not recorded!\n",
+                                      engine->name);
                                err = -EINVAL;
                                break;
                        }
@@ -728,7 +723,6 @@ static int __igt_reset_engines(struct drm_i915_private 
*i915,
set_bit(I915_RESET_ENGINE + id, &i915->gpu_error.flags);
                do {
-                       u32 seqno = intel_engine_get_seqno(engine);
                        struct i915_request *rq = NULL;
if (flags & TEST_ACTIVE) {
@@ -756,9 +750,6 @@ static int __igt_reset_engines(struct drm_i915_private 
*i915,
                                        err = -EIO;
                                        break;
                                }
-
-                               GEM_BUG_ON(!rq->global_seqno);
-                               seqno = rq->global_seqno - 1;
                        }
err = i915_reset_engine(engine, NULL);
@@ -795,10 +786,9 @@ static int __igt_reset_engines(struct drm_i915_private 
*i915,
reported = i915_reset_engine_count(&i915->gpu_error, engine);
                reported -= threads[engine->id].resets;
-               if (reported != (flags & TEST_ACTIVE ? count : 0)) {
-                       pr_err("i915_reset_engine(%s:%s): reset %lu times, but 
reported %lu, expected %lu reported\n",
-                              engine->name, test_name, count, reported,
-                              (flags & TEST_ACTIVE ? count : 0));
+               if (reported != count) {
+                       pr_err("i915_reset_engine(%s:%s): reset %lu times, but 
reported %lu\n",
+                              engine->name, test_name, count, reported);
                        if (!err)
                                err = -EINVAL;
                }

Reviewed-by: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to