Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-02-26 13:34:51) > > On 14/02/2019 14:57, Matthew Auld wrote: > > From: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janul...@linux.intel.com> > > > > CPU mmap implementation depending on the object's backing pages. > > depends? > > > At the moment we introduce shmem and local-memory BAR fault handlers > > Note that the mmap type is done one at a time to circumvent the DRM > > offset manager limitation. Note that we multiplex mmap_gtt and > > Perhaps it is time to sort out the offset manager? I have a feeling that > would make things much easier/cleaner for us.
I had skipped the changelog and didn't realise that was being blamed for getting mmaps so wrong... I don't buy that excuse. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
