Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-03-01 16:12:33) > > On 01/03/2019 14:03, Chris Wilson wrote: > > +I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static unsigned long context_barrier_inject_fault); > > +static int context_barrier_task(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, > > + unsigned long engines, > > I'm in two minds about usefulness of intel_engine_mask_t.
I'm thinking if we store it in a struct, then yes, always use intel_engine_mask_t. For function parameters, the natural type is unsigned long and we have some time before worrying about the lack of bits. So it's a problem for future self and I'm ambivalent about the need to enforce it just yet. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
