Quoting Rafael Antognolli (2019-03-05 17:30:00) > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 01:48:26PM +0100, Michał Winiarski wrote: > > We assumed that the default preemption granularity is fine for ICL. > > Unfortunately, it turns out that some drivers don't support mid-thread > > preemption for compute workloads. > > If a workload that doesn't support mid-thread preemption gets mid-thread > > preempted, we're going to observe a GPU hang. > > While I'm here, let's also update the "workaround" naming. > > Yeah, in Mesa we are not implementing the SIP, so we can't do > thread-level preemption yet and need the granularity to be no higher > than thread group level. > > Acked-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antogno...@intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com> > > Cc: Anuj Phogat <anuj.pho...@intel.com> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com> > > Cc: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antogno...@intel.com> > > Tested-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.pho...@intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
And pushed, thanks everyone for the testing and reviewed. I've held off on pushing the second patch as we just want to double check that the whitelisting is required. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
