On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 12:26 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 22:47 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > If has_psr is set it means that CRTC has a EDP panel attached so it > > can be dropped, also has_psr is better than check for EDP output > > alone as it will avoid set mode_changed when PSR is not supported > > in > > panel or with current modeset. > Since we were already checking has_psr, I don't think it is relevant > to > say checking just that is "better than check for EDP output alone". > Can > you please reword the commit message?
What about replace everything to:
If has_psr is set it means that CRTC has a EDP panel attached so the
EDP check is redundant and can be dropped.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index 6175b1d2e0c8..2d9f64c362e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -981,9 +981,7 @@ static int intel_psr_fastset_force(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >
> > intel_crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state);
> >
> > - if (crtc_state->active &&
> > - intel_crtc_has_type(intel_crtc_state,
> > INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) &&
> > - intel_crtc_state->has_psr) {
> > + if (crtc_state->active && intel_crtc_state->has_psr) {
> > /* Mark mode as changed to trigger a pipe-
> > > update() */
> > crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
> > break;
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
