Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-03-21 09:11:30) > Quoting Patchwork (2019-03-21 09:04:59) > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: Skip object locking around a no-op set-domain ioctl > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/58325/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5785 -> Patchwork_12542 > > ==================================================== > > > > Summary > > ------- > > > > **FAILURE** > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_12542 absolutely need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_12542, please notify your bug team to allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in > > CI. > > > > External URL: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/58325/revisions/1/mbox/ > > > > Possible new issues > > ------------------- > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > Patchwork_12542: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > #### Possible regressions #### > > > > * igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-active: > > - fi-bsw-kefka: PASS -> FAIL +7 > > - fi-hsw-4770r: PASS -> FAIL +3 > > - fi-cfl-8109u: PASS -> FAIL +3 > > - fi-byt-clapper: PASS -> FAIL +7 > > - fi-ivb-3770: PASS -> FAIL +3 > > - fi-icl-u3: PASS -> FAIL +3 > > - fi-skl-gvtdvm: PASS -> FAIL +2 > > Intriguing, now that might explain some of the random failure we've > seen here over the years, as we unexpectedly take the slow path.
Sadly, not these are the active variant so the inaccurate test shortcircuited the required read synchronisation. And I hope the lack of the read clflush will explain the !llc.. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
