On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 22:49 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > If I'm reading the spec right AML 0x87CA is a Y SKU, so it > should be marked as ULX in our old style terminology.
You are right, only the CPU is based on CFL.
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> Fixes: c0c46ca461f1 ("drm/i915/aml: Add new Amber Lake PCI ID")
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index f723b15527f8..428279fd88a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2361,7 +2361,8 @@ static inline unsigned int
> i915_sg_segment_size(void)
> INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x5915 || \
> INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x591E)
> #define IS_AML_ULX(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x591C || \
> - INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x87C0)
> + INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x87C0 || \
> + INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x87CA)
> #define IS_SKL_GT2(dev_priv) (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && \
> INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gt == 2)
> #define IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && \
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
