On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 06:16:57PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:00:27AM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:49:02PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Currently we enable FEC even when DSC is no used. While that is
> > > theoretically valid supposedly there isn't much of a benefit from
> > > this. But more importantly we do not account for the FEC link
> > > bandwidth overhead (2.4%) in the non-DSC link bandwidth computations.
> > > So the code may think we have enough bandwidth when we in fact
> > > do not.
> > >
> > > Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.comk>
> > > Fixes: 240999cf339f ("i915/dp/fec: Add fec_enable to the crtc state.")
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index 326de12c3f44..bbf678561509 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -1925,6 +1925,9 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > int pipe_bpp;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > + pipe_config->fec_enable = !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> > > + intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> > > +
> >
> > We could still not enable DSC after this point since it has more checks in
> > this
> > function. Even though in that case we would fail the encoder config so
> > wouldnt
> > matter if we have enabled FEC or not, but its less intutive.
> > IMHO, the ideal place to set the fec enable is in
> > intel_dp_compute_link_config()
> > after the all to dsc_compute_config and set it only if
> > pipe_config->dsc_params.compression_enable
>
> That would require changing intel_dp_supports_dsc() which I decided
> wasn't worth the hassle.
Hmm, yea because intel_dp_supports_dsc depends on fec_enable.
In that case we would need to change that to use intel_dp_supports_fec(). TBH
that makes more sense since
we should set dp_supports based on HW FEC capability and then set the
crtc_state->fec_enable based
on crtc_state->dsc_params.compression_enable. But since it doesnt change the
functionality, I am ok
either ways.
Manasi
>
> >
> > Manasi
> >
> > > if (!intel_dp_supports_dsc(intel_dp, pipe_config))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > @@ -2168,9 +2171,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder
> > > *encoder,
> > > if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - pipe_config->fec_enable = !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> > > - intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> > > -
> > > ret = intel_dp_compute_link_config(encoder, pipe_config, conn_state);
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > return ret;
> > > --
> > > 2.19.2
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
