Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-04-08 16:27:01)
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> We have a lot of '(u64)foo * bar' everywhere. Replace with
> mul_u32_u32() to avoid gcc failing to use a regular 32x32->64
> multiply for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
As a purely mechanical translation,
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index e01c057ce50b..29edc369920b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2741,11 +2741,11 @@ static bool icl_calc_mg_pll_state(struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> }
>
> if (use_ssc) {
> - tmp = (u64)dco_khz * 47 * 32;
> + tmp = mul_u32_u32(dco_khz, 47 * 32);
> do_div(tmp, refclk_khz * m1div * 10000);
> ssc_stepsize = tmp;
>
> - tmp = (u64)dco_khz * 1000;
> + tmp = mul_u32_u32(dco_khz, 1000);
These caught my eye, wondering if the code was better reduced if the
constant was first or itself cast to (u64).
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
