Some CI systems might be configured to run with no longer supported configuration "enable_guc=3" or "enable_guc=1". Hack that ;)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c index a1a068511fd9..c40c8e6e6cd9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c @@ -105,6 +105,12 @@ static void sanitize_options_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915) struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &i915->guc.fw; struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw = &i915->huc.fw; + /* HAX: prevent CI failures on configs with forced GuC */ + if (i915_modparams.enable_guc & ENABLE_GUC_SUBMISSION) { + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("turning off ENABLE_GUC_SUBMISSION\n"); + i915_modparams.enable_guc &= ~ENABLE_GUC_SUBMISSION; + } + /* A negative value means "use platform default" */ if (i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0) i915_modparams.enable_guc = __get_platform_enable_guc(i915); -- 2.19.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx