Avoid charging us for the presumed busywait if the request was preempted
after successfully using semaphores to reduce inter-engine latency.

v2: Bump the priority to reflect the lack of semaphores now required.

References: ca6e56f654e7 ("drm/i915: Disable semaphore busywaits on saturated 
systems")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index bed213148cbb..11670774cd25 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -509,6 +509,12 @@ void __i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request)
        /* Transfer back from the global per-engine timeline to per-context */
        move_to_timeline(request, request->timeline);
 
+       /* We've already spun, don't charge on resubmitting. */
+       if (request->sched.semaphores && i915_request_started(request)) {
+               request->sched.attr.priority |= I915_PRIORITY_NOSEMAPHORE;
+               request->sched.semaphores = 0;
+       }
+
        /*
         * We don't need to wake_up any waiters on request->execute, they
         * will get woken by any other event or us re-adding this request
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to