From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
The first version of commit "drm/i915: there's no DSPADDR register on
Haswell" added 2 "!IS_HASWELL" checks. When reviewing the patch, Ben
suggested to make these checks more future-proof, so when Daniel
applied the patch he fixed the first check but not the second. This
commit makes the second check also "future-proof".
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 36e0445..98ac3bd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -9416,7 +9416,7 @@ intel_display_print_error_state(struct seq_file *m,
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen <= 3)
seq_printf(m, " SIZE: %08x\n", error->plane[i].size);
seq_printf(m, " POS: %08x\n", error->plane[i].pos);
- if (!IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen <= 7 && !IS_HASWELL(dev))
seq_printf(m, " ADDR: %08x\n", error->plane[i].addr);
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) {
seq_printf(m, " SURF: %08x\n",
error->plane[i].surface);
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
