On 29/05/2019 16:04, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019, Colin King <colin.k...@canonical.com> wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>>
>> Currently subslice_mask is not initialized and so data is being
>> bit-wise or'd into a garbage value. Fix this by inintializing
>> subslice_mask to zero.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
>> Fixes: 1ac159e23c2c ("drm/i915: Expand subslice mask")
> 
> This was already reverted for other reasons. Need to be fixed on the
> next round. For future reference, please Cc: author and reviewers of the
> referenced commit.

OK, will do.

Thanks, Colin
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> index 3625f777f3a3..d395a09b994f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static void cherryview_sseu_info_init(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  {
>>      struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = &RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->sseu;
>>      u32 fuse;
>> -    u8 subslice_mask;
>> +    u8 subslice_mask = 0;
>>  
>>      fuse = I915_READ(CHV_FUSE_GT);
> 

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to