On 14/06/2019 01:28, Robert M. Fosha wrote:
From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>

Updated whitelist table for CFL.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert M. Fosha <robert.m.fo...@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 5308a0864e78..60bd515edaf1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -1092,10 +1092,43 @@ static void glk_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine)
static void cfl_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  {
+       struct i915_wa_list *w = &engine->whitelist;
+
        if (engine->class != RENDER_CLASS)
                return;
- gen9_whitelist_build(&engine->whitelist);
+       /* Whitelist entries from BSpec page 53688: */
+       gen9_whitelist_build(w);
+
+       /* WaSendPushConstantsFromMMIO:cfl */
+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN2,
+                         RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW);
+
+       /* GEN9_CS_DEBUG_MODE1 */
+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, GEN9_CS_DEBUG_MODE1,
+                                 RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW);
+
+       /* WaAllowUmdWriteTRTTRootTable:cfl */
+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, _MMIO(0x4DE0), RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW);
+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, _MMIO(0x4DE4), RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW);
+
+       /* WaAllowUMDToDisableVFAutoStrip:cfl */
+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, _MMIO(0x83A8), RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW);
+
+       /* WaAllowPMDepthAndInvocationCountAccessFromUMD:cfl
+        * NB: this also pulls in CL_PRIMITIVES_COUNT in same block
+        * as PS_INVOCATIONS_COUNT. Likewise, TIMESTAMP in the
+        * PS_DEPTH_COUNT block.
+        */

Nitpick but please use multi-line comments in style:

/*
 *
 */

We are trying not to add more of the unpopular style.

+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, CL_PRIMITIVES_COUNT,
+                         RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW |
+                         RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RANGE_4);
+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, PS_DEPTH_COUNT, RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW |
+                         RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RANGE_4);
+
+       /* WaAllowUMDAccesstoOARegisters:cfl */
+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, _MMIO(0x28A0), RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW);
+       whitelist_reg_ext(w, OAREPORTTRIG6, RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RW);

AFAICS majority of the register here shouldn't use the whitelist_reg_ext but normal whitelist_reg. It will help with readability a bit and the special ones would stick out more.

  }
static void cnl_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)


With the two tweaks:

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to