On 18/06/2019 21:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
In order to pin the engine as busy, we have to prevent the kernel from
executing other independent work ahead of our plug, so tell the spinner
to not allow preemption.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
  tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c
index 3ecade417..d47cbdd7c 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c
@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ static void execute_one(int i915)
spin = igt_spin_new(i915,
                                            .ctx = param.ctx_id,
-                                           .engine = 0);
+                                           .engine = 0,
+                                           .flags = IGT_SPIN_NO_PREEMPTION);
igt_debug("Testing with map of %d engines\n", i + 1);
                        memset(&engines.engines, -1, sizeof(engines.engines));


The no-op batch preempts the spinner? How does that affect the busy check on the no-op batch?

Regards,

Tvrtko


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to