The static keyword was apparently accidentally removed in commit
08fa8fd0faa5 ("drm/i915: Switch to per-crtc vblank vfuncs"), leading to
sparse warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:3382:6: warning: symbol
'i945gm_vblank_work_func' was not declared. Should it be static?
Make the function static again.
Fixes: 08fa8fd0faa5 ("drm/i915: Switch to per-crtc vblank vfuncs")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 1b83d6e2ae69..73f0338faf9f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -3379,7 +3379,7 @@ void bdw_disable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
}
-void i945gm_vblank_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
+static void i945gm_vblank_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
container_of(work, struct drm_i915_private, i945gm_vblank.work);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
