On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:18:11PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 04:37:32PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
Our past DDI-based Intel platforms have had a fixed DDI<->PHY mapping.
Because of this, both the bspec documentation and our i915 code has used
the term "port" when talking about either DDI's or PHY's; it was always
easy to tell what terms like "Port A" were referring to from the
context.

Unfortunately this is starting to break down now that EHL allows PHY-A
to be driven by either DDI-A or DDI-D.  Is a setup with DDI-D driving
PHY-A considered "Port A" or "Port D?"  The answer depends on which
register we're working with, and even the bspec doesn't do a great job
of clarifying this.

Let's try to be more explicit about whether we're talking about the DDI
or the PHY on gen11+ by using 'port' to refer to the DDI and creating a
new 'enum phy' namespace to refer to the PHY in use.

This patch just adds the new PHY namespace, new phy-based versions of
intel_port_is_*(), and a helper to convert a port to a PHY.
Transitioning various areas of the code over to using the PHY namespace
will be done in subsequent patches to make review easier.  We'll remove
the intel_port_is_*() functions at the end of the series when we
transition all callers over to using the PHY-based versions.

v2:
 - Convert a few more 'port' uses to 'phy.' (Sparse)

v3:
 - Switch DDI_CLK_SEL() back to 'port.' (Jose)
 - Add a code comment clarifying why DPCLKA_CFGCR0_ICL needs to use PHY
   for its bit definitions, even though the register description is
   given in terms of DDI.
 - To avoid confusion, switch CNL's DPCLKA_CFGCR0 defines back to using
   port and create separate ICL+ definitions that work in terms of PHY.

v4:
 - Rebase and resolve conflicts with Imre's TC series.
 - This patch now just adds the namespace and a few convenience
   functions; the important changes are now split out into separate
   patches to make review easier.

Suggested-by: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 16 ++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h             |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 919f5ac844c8..4a85abef93e7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -6663,6 +6663,20 @@ bool intel_port_is_combophy(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv, enum port port)
        return false;
 }

+bool intel_phy_is_combo(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
+{
+       if (phy == PHY_NONE)
+               return false;
+
+       if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv))
+               return phy <= PHY_C;
+
+       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
+               return phy <= PHY_B;
+
+       return false;
+}
+
 bool intel_port_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
 {
        if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && !IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv))
@@ -6671,9 +6685,25 @@ bool intel_port_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, 
enum port port)
        return false;
 }

+bool intel_phy_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
+{
+       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && !IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv))
+               return phy >= PHY_C && phy <= PHY_F;
+
+       return false;
+}
+
+enum phy intel_port_to_phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
+{
+       if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(i915) && port == PORT_D)
+               return PHY_A;
+
+       return (enum phy)port;
+}
+
 enum tc_port intel_port_to_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port 
port)
 {
-       if (!intel_port_is_tc(dev_priv, port))
+       if (!intel_phy_is_tc(dev_priv, intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, port)))
                return PORT_TC_NONE;

        return port - PORT_C;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
index d296556ed82e..d53285fb883f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
@@ -228,6 +228,21 @@ struct intel_link_m_n {
        u32 link_n;
 };

+enum phy {
+       PHY_NONE = -1,
+
+       PHY_A = 0,
+       PHY_B,
+       PHY_C,
+       PHY_D,
+       PHY_E,
+       PHY_F,
+
+       I915_MAX_PHYS
+};

I was pondering if we could eventually do something like:

enum phy {
        PHY_COMBO_A = 0,
        PHY_COMBO_B,
        ...

        PHY_TC_1,
        PHY_TC_2,
        ...
};

and probably also add encoder->phy so we can contain
that port<->phy mapping logic in the encoder init.
I think that should work more or less fine since I
don't think PHY_TC_1 needs to have any specific value.

that's not true. All TC registers are based off the TC phy number.
Hence all the conversion we do port_to_tc()... I'd like to remove that
in future and just stuff the phy index in intel_digital_port, as we
already do for other tc_phy_* fields (we could add a union there so each
phy adds its own fields).

And I'd rather not do the single phy namespace - it doesn't
play well with TGL and the combo/tc.

Lucas De Marchi


Unfortunaltey I don't have a great idea how to do the
same for the DDIs since there the number of combo DDIs
changes but we still need the PORT_TC1 (assuming we had
one) to be DDI_<last combo DDI> + 1. One random silly
idea was to decouple the enum port from the register
definitions by having just some kind of
encoder->port_index for those. But that doesn't feel
entirely great either.

Anyways, something to think about in the future perhaps.

Patch is
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

+
+#define phy_name(a) ((a) + 'A')
+
 #define for_each_pipe(__dev_priv, __p) \
        for ((__p) = 0; (__p) < INTEL_INFO(__dev_priv)->num_pipes; (__p)++)

@@ -356,5 +371,6 @@ void lpt_disable_clkout_dp(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv);
 u32 intel_plane_fb_max_stride(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                              u32 pixel_format, u64 modifier);
 bool intel_plane_can_remap(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
+enum phy intel_port_to_phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port);

 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 24c63ed45c6f..815c26c0b98c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1493,7 +1493,9 @@ void intel_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
 struct drm_display_mode *
 intel_encoder_current_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
 bool intel_port_is_combophy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port);
+bool intel_phy_is_combo(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy);
 bool intel_port_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port);
+bool intel_phy_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy);
 enum tc_port intel_port_to_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                              enum port port);
 int intel_get_pipe_from_crtc_id_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
--
2.17.2

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to