On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:46:42AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Lucas De Marchi wrote:

From: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>

Reuse Gen11 stolen memory changes since Tiger Lake uses the same BSM
register (and format).

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: x...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
index 6c4f01540833..6f6b1d04dadf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
@@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_early_ids[] 
__initconst = {
        INTEL_CNL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
        INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&gen11_early_ops),
        INTEL_EHL_IDS(&gen11_early_ops),
+       INTEL_TGL_12_IDS(&gen11_early_ops),

How exactly is this supposed to build?


The define for this new platform is on drm-intel repository. For
previous platforms we waited for an ack and merged through our tree.
Is that ok?

thanks
Lucas De Marchi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to