On Thu 08-08-19 16:25:04, Weiny, Ira wrote: > > I thought I'd caught things early enough to get away with the > > rename and deletion of that. You could either: > > > > a) open code an implementation of vaddr_put_pages_dirty_lock() that > > doesn't call any of the *put_user_pages_dirty*() variants, or > > > > b) include my first patch ("") are part of your series, or > > > > c) base this on Andrews's tree, which already has merged in my first patch. > > > > Yep I can do this. I did not realize that Andrew had accepted any of > this work. I'll check out his tree. But I don't think he is going to > accept this series through his tree. So what is the ETA on that landing > in Linus' tree? > > To that point I'm still not sure who would take all this as I am now > touching mm, procfs, rdma, ext4, and xfs.
MM tree would be one candidate for routing but there are other options that would make sense as well - Dan's tree, VFS tree, or even I can pickup the patches to my tree if needed. But let's worry about the routing after we have working and reviewed patches... Honza -- Jan Kara <j...@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx