From: "Yang, Dong" <dong.y...@intel.com> The APL already fixed this bug since GT E, bug exist from 0 to D, apply WA according GT stepping.
Signed-off-by: Yang, Dong <dong.y...@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 5f3e5c13fbaa..ee384c28174a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -2141,6 +2141,8 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915, #define BXT_REVID_B0 0x3 #define BXT_REVID_B_LAST 0x8 #define BXT_REVID_C0 0x9 +#define BXT_REVID_D0 0xC +#define BXT_REVID_E0 0xD #define IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, since, until) \ (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && IS_REVID(dev_priv, since, until)) @@ -2357,7 +2359,7 @@ static inline bool intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) static inline bool intel_ggtt_update_needs_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - return IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && intel_vtd_active(); + return return IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_D0) && intel_vtd_active(); } /* i915_drv.c */ -- 2.22.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx