Am 22.08.19 um 15:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:56:56AM +0000, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 22.08.19 um 08:49 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> With nouveau fixed all ttm-using drives have the correct nesting of
>>> mmap_sem vs dma_resv, and we can just lock the buffer.
>>>
>>> Assuming I didn't screw up anything with my audit of course.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Dont forget wu_mutex (Christian König)
>>> - Keep the mmap_sem-less wait optimization (Thomas)
>>> - Use _lock_interruptible to be good citizens (Thomas)
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> btw I realized I didn't remove your r-b, since v1 was broken.
>
> For formality, can you pls reaffirm, or still something broken?
My r-b is still valid.
Only problem I see is that neither of us seems to have a good idea about
the different VM_FAULT_* replies.
But that worked before so it should still work now,
Christian.
>
> Also from the other thread: Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström
> <thellst...@vmware.com>
>
> Thanks, Daniel
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koe...@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.hu...@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: "VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintai...@vmware.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellst...@vmware.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 36 -------------------------------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 1 -
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 18 +++++-----------
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 4 ----
>>> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> index 20ff56f27aa4..d1ce5d315d5b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> @@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ static void ttm_bo_release_list(struct kref *list_kref)
>>> dma_fence_put(bo->moving);
>>> if (!ttm_bo_uses_embedded_gem_object(bo))
>>> dma_resv_fini(&bo->base._resv);
>>> - mutex_destroy(&bo->wu_mutex);
>>> bo->destroy(bo);
>>> ttm_mem_global_free(bdev->glob->mem_glob, acc_size);
>>> }
>>> @@ -1319,7 +1318,6 @@ int ttm_bo_init_reserved(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bo->ddestroy);
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bo->swap);
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bo->io_reserve_lru);
>>> - mutex_init(&bo->wu_mutex);
>>> bo->bdev = bdev;
>>> bo->type = type;
>>> bo->num_pages = num_pages;
>>> @@ -1954,37 +1952,3 @@ void ttm_bo_swapout_all(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
>>> ;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_swapout_all);
>>> -
>>> -/**
>>> - * ttm_bo_wait_unreserved - interruptible wait for a buffer object to
>>> become
>>> - * unreserved
>>> - *
>>> - * @bo: Pointer to buffer
>>> - */
>>> -int ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>> -{
>>> - int ret;
>>> -
>>> - /*
>>> - * In the absense of a wait_unlocked API,
>>> - * Use the bo::wu_mutex to avoid triggering livelocks due to
>>> - * concurrent use of this function. Note that this use of
>>> - * bo::wu_mutex can go away if we change locking order to
>>> - * mmap_sem -> bo::reserve.
>>> - */
>>> - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&bo->wu_mutex);
>>> - if (unlikely(ret != 0))
>>> - return -ERESTARTSYS;
>>> - if (!dma_resv_is_locked(bo->base.resv))
>>> - goto out_unlock;
>>> - ret = dma_resv_lock_interruptible(bo->base.resv, NULL);
>>> - if (ret == -EINTR)
>>> - ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
>>> - if (unlikely(ret != 0))
>>> - goto out_unlock;
>>> - dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
>>> -
>>> -out_unlock:
>>> - mutex_unlock(&bo->wu_mutex);
>>> - return ret;
>>> -}
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
>>> index fe81c565e7ef..82ea26a49959 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
>>> @@ -508,7 +508,6 @@ static int ttm_buffer_object_transfer(struct
>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fbo->base.lru);
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fbo->base.swap);
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fbo->base.io_reserve_lru);
>>> - mutex_init(&fbo->base.wu_mutex);
>>> fbo->base.moving = NULL;
>>> drm_vma_node_reset(&fbo->base.base.vma_node);
>>> atomic_set(&fbo->base.cpu_writers, 0);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>>> index 76eedb963693..a61a35e57d1c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>>> @@ -125,30 +125,22 @@ static vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_fault(struct vm_fault
>>> *vmf)
>>> &bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type];
>>> struct vm_area_struct cvma;
>>>
>>> - /*
>>> - * Work around locking order reversal in fault / nopfn
>>> - * between mmap_sem and bo_reserve: Perform a trylock operation
>>> - * for reserve, and if it fails, retry the fault after waiting
>>> - * for the buffer to become unreserved.
>>> - */
>>> if (unlikely(!dma_resv_trylock(bo->base.resv))) {
>>> if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY) {
>>> if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT)) {
>> Not an expert on fault handling, but shouldn't this now be one if?
>>
>> E.g. if FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT is set we should return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE
>> instead of VM_FAULT_RETRY.
>>
>> But really take that with a grain of salt,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> ttm_bo_get(bo);
>>> up_read(&vmf->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
>>> - (void) ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(bo);
>>> + if (!dma_resv_lock_interruptible(bo->base.resv,
>>> + NULL))
>>> + dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
>>> ttm_bo_put(bo);
>>> }
>>>
>>> return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - /*
>>> - * If we'd want to change locking order to
>>> - * mmap_sem -> bo::reserve, we'd use a blocking reserve here
>>> - * instead of retrying the fault...
>>> - */
>>> - return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
>>> + if (dma_resv_lock_interruptible(bo->base.resv, NULL))
>>> + return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> index 43c4929a2171..21c7d0d28757 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ struct ttm_tt;
>>> * @offset: The current GPU offset, which can have different meanings
>>> * depending on the memory type. For SYSTEM type memory, it should be 0.
>>> * @cur_placement: Hint of current placement.
>>> - * @wu_mutex: Wait unreserved mutex.
>>> *
>>> * Base class for TTM buffer object, that deals with data placement and
>>> CPU
>>> * mappings. GPU mappings are really up to the driver, but for simpler
>>> GPUs
>>> @@ -229,8 +228,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>> uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
>>>
>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>> -
>>> - struct mutex wu_mutex;
>>> };
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -765,7 +762,6 @@ ssize_t ttm_bo_io(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct
>>> file *filp,
>>> int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_bo_global *glob,
>>> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx);
>>> void ttm_bo_swapout_all(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev);
>>> -int ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
>>>
>>> /**
>>> * ttm_bo_uses_embedded_gem_object - check if the given bo uses the
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
