On 8/28/2019 12:40 AM, Animesh Manna wrote:
DSB can program large set of data through indexed register write
(opcode 0x9) in one shot. Will be using for bulk register programming
Reshuffle-> This feature can be used for bulk register programming e.g.
e.g. gamma lut programming, HDR meta data programming.

v1: Initial version.

v2: simplified code by using ALIGN(). (Chris)

Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.ma...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h |  8 ++++
  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
index df288446caeb..520f2bbcc8ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
  #define DSB_OPCODE_INDEXED_WRITE      0x9
  #define DSB_OPCODE_POLL                       0xA
  #define DSB_BYTE_EN                   (0xf << 20)
+#define DSB_REG_VALUE_MASK             0xfffff
struct intel_dsb *
  intel_dsb_get(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
@@ -96,6 +97,53 @@ void intel_dsb_put(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
        }
  }
+void intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg,
+                                u32 val)
We might need one space here, to get this aligned to start of the line above (or is this due to my mail client ?).
+{
+       struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
+       u32 *buf = dsb->cmd_buf;
+       u32 reg_val;
+
- Do we need a HAS_DSB check at start or the caller will take care of it ?
+       if (!buf) {
+               I915_WRITE(reg, val);
I am under the assumption that indexed reg write is to write multiple registers, and 'reg' is the base value of the register set. I dont think it makes sense to write a single register here in case of DSB failure ?
+               return;
+       }
+
+       if (WARN_ON(dsb->free_pos >= DSB_BUF_SIZE)) {
+               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DSB buffer overflow.\n");
+               return;
+       }
+       reg_val = buf[dsb->ins_start_offset + 1] & DSB_REG_VALUE_MASK;

Why do we have this +1 here ? on the very first run (when ins_start_offset is 0), this will fetch reg_val = buf[1]; Is this what we want to do ?

+       if (reg_val != i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)) {
+               /* Every instruction should be 8 byte aligned. */
+               dsb->free_pos = ALIGN(dsb->free_pos, 2);
The comment says that you want the position to be 8 bytes align, but the factor sent to the macro is 2 ?
+
+               /* Update the size. */
+               dsb->ins_start_offset = dsb->free_pos;
This comment is irrelevant, you are not updating the size, you are caching the base memory location.
+               buf[dsb->free_pos++] = 1;

What does this indicate ? What is 1 ?

It would be great if you can add an aski graph/table and explain what does this DSB command buffer actually contains as per your design.

+
+               /* Update the opcode and reg. */
+               buf[dsb->free_pos++] = (DSB_OPCODE_INDEXED_WRITE  <<
+                                       DSB_OPCODE_SHIFT) |
+                                       i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg);
+
+               /* Update the value. */
+               buf[dsb->free_pos++] = val;
+       } else {
+               /* Update the new value. */
+               buf[dsb->free_pos++] = val;
+
+               /* Update the size. */
+               buf[dsb->ins_start_offset]++;
+       }

The code is looking unnecessarily complicated as ins_start_offset and free_pos are being used for multiple reasons. I guess you can use some local variables like:

u32 base = count = ALIGN();

 {

    buf [count++] = size;

   buf [count++] = command;

  buf [count++] = value;

}

dsb->start_offset = base;

dsb->free_pos = count;

+
+       /* if number of data words is odd, then the last dword should be 0.*/
+       if (dsb->free_pos & 0x1)
+               buf[dsb->free_pos] = 0;
+}
+
  void intel_dsb_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
  {
        struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
index 1b33ab118640..c848747f52d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
@@ -30,11 +30,19 @@ struct intel_dsb {
         * and help in calculating cmd_buf_tail.
         */
        int free_pos;
+
+       /*
+        * ins_start_offset will help to store start address
+        * of the dsb instuction of auto-increment register.
+        */
+       u32 ins_start_offset;
How about the variable to be named as base_offset ? Also, do we need to keep this saved, even when the writing is done ?
  };
struct intel_dsb *
  intel_dsb_get(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
  void intel_dsb_put(struct intel_dsb *dsb);
  void intel_dsb_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val);
+void intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg,
+                                u32 val);

Cross check the alignment of second line.

- Shashank

#endif
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to