On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 10:44:39PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> Add max_dc_state and tgl_set_target_dc_state() API
> in order to enable DC3CO state with existing DC states.
> max_dc_state will enable/disable the desired DC state in
> DC_STATE_EN reg when "DC Off" power well gets disable/enable.
> 
> v2: commit log improvement.
> v3: Used intel_wait_for_register to wait for DC3CO exit. [Imre]
>     Used gen9_set_dc_state() to allow/disallow DC3CO. [Imre]
>     Moved transcoder psr2 exit line enablement from tgl_allow_dc3co()
>     to a appropriate place haswell_crtc_enable(). [Imre]
>     Changed the DC3CO power well enabled call back logic as
>     recommended in review comments. [Imre]
> v4: Used wait_for_us() instead of intel_wait_for_reg(). [Imre (IRC)]
> v5: using udelay() instead of waiting for DC3CO exit status.
> v6: Fixed minor unwanted change.
> v7: Removed DC3CO powerwell and POWER_DOMAIN_VIDEO.
> 
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.ma...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gu...@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c    | 111 ++++++++++++++----
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h    |   3 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 496fa1b53ffb..83b10f61ee42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -772,6 +772,29 @@ static void gen9_set_dc_state(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv, u32 state)
>       dev_priv->csr.dc_state = val & mask;
>  }
>  
> +static void tgl_allow_dc3co(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)

Should be tgl_enable_dc3co(), to match the rest of DC state helpers.

> +{
> +     if (!dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support)
> +             return;

PSR knows when to enable DC3co, so no need to double-check that here.

> +
> +     if (dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask & DC_STATE_EN_DC3CO)

This check is out-of-place wrt. the same checks for other DC states.

> +             gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_DC3CO);
> +}
> +
> +static void tgl_disallow_dc3co(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +     u32 val;
> +
> +     val = I915_READ(DC_STATE_EN);
> +     val &= ~DC_STATE_DC3CO_STATUS;
> +     I915_WRITE(DC_STATE_EN, val);
> +     gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
> +     /*
> +      * Delay of 200us DC3CO Exit time B.Spec 49196
> +      */
> +     udelay(200);
> +}
> +
>  static void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       assert_can_enable_dc9(dev_priv);
> @@ -939,7 +962,8 @@ static void bxt_verify_ddi_phy_power_wells(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  static bool gen9_dc_off_power_well_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>                                          struct i915_power_well *power_well)
>  {
> -     return (I915_READ(DC_STATE_EN) & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5_DC6_MASK) == 0;
> +     return ((I915_READ(DC_STATE_EN) & DC_STATE_EN_DC3CO) == 0 &&
> +             (I915_READ(DC_STATE_EN) & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5_DC6_MASK) == 0);
>  }
>  
>  static void gen9_assert_dbuf_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -955,24 +979,32 @@ static void gen9_disable_dc_states(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       struct intel_cdclk_state cdclk_state = {};
>  
> -     gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
> +     if (dev_priv->csr.max_dc_state & DC_STATE_EN_DC3CO) {
> +             tgl_disallow_dc3co(dev_priv);
> +     } else {

With an early return you can avoid the extra diff and make reviewing
easier.

> +             gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  
> -     dev_priv->display.get_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> -     /* Can't read out voltage_level so can't use intel_cdclk_changed() */
> -     WARN_ON(intel_cdclk_needs_modeset(&dev_priv->cdclk.hw, &cdclk_state));
> +             dev_priv->display.get_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> +             /*
> +              * Can't read out voltage_level so can't use
> +              * intel_cdclk_changed()
> +              */
> +             WARN_ON(intel_cdclk_needs_modeset(&dev_priv->cdclk.hw,
> +                                               &cdclk_state));
>  
> -     gen9_assert_dbuf_enabled(dev_priv);
> +             gen9_assert_dbuf_enabled(dev_priv);
>  
> -     if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> -             bxt_verify_ddi_phy_power_wells(dev_priv);
> +             if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> +                     bxt_verify_ddi_phy_power_wells(dev_priv);
>  
> -     if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> -             /*
> -              * DMC retains HW context only for port A, the other combo
> -              * PHY's HW context for port B is lost after DC transitions,
> -              * so we need to restore it manually.
> -              */
> -             intel_combo_phy_init(dev_priv);
> +             if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> +                     /*
> +                      * DMC retains HW context only for port A, the other
> +                      * combo PHY's HW context for port B is lost after
> +                      * DC transitions, so we need to restore it manually.
> +                      */
> +                     intel_combo_phy_init(dev_priv);
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  static void gen9_dc_off_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -987,10 +1019,48 @@ static void gen9_dc_off_power_well_disable(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>       if (!dev_priv->csr.dmc_payload)
>               return;
>  
> -     if (dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6)
> -             skl_enable_dc6(dev_priv);
> -     else if (dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5)
> -             gen9_enable_dc5(dev_priv);
> +     if (dev_priv->csr.max_dc_state & DC_STATE_EN_DC3CO) {

target_dc_state would be a better name and it shold be an exact state
instead of a mask.

> +             tgl_allow_dc3co(dev_priv);
> +     } else if (dev_priv->csr.max_dc_state & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5_DC6_MASK) {
> +             if (dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6)

We should make these checks more uniform, by checking here only
target_dc_state.

> +                     skl_enable_dc6(dev_priv);
> +             else if (dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5)
> +                     gen9_enable_dc5(dev_priv);
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +void tgl_set_target_dc_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 state,
> +                          bool psr2_deep_sleep)

psr2_deep_sleep is a PSR internal stuff, while PSR is using the power
domains framework, so let's keep the deep sleep programming in the PSR
code.

> +{
> +     struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> +     bool dc_off_enabled;
> +     struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> +     power_well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, TGL_DISP_DC_OFF);
> +
> +     if (!power_well)
> +             goto unlock;
> +
> +     dc_off_enabled = power_well->desc->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv,
> +                                                        power_well);
> +     if (state == dev_priv->csr.max_dc_state)
> +             goto unlock;
> +
> +     if (!dc_off_enabled) {
> +             /*
> +              * Need to disable the DC off power well to
> +              * effect target DC state.
> +              */
> +             power_well->desc->ops->enable(dev_priv, power_well);
> +             dev_priv->csr.max_dc_state = state;
> +             power_well->desc->ops->disable(dev_priv, power_well);
> +             goto unlock;
> +     }
> +             dev_priv->csr.max_dc_state = state;
> +
> +unlock:
> +     mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void i9xx_power_well_sync_hw_noop(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -3610,7 +3680,7 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc 
> tgl_power_wells[] = {
>               .name = "DC off",
>               .domains = TGL_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS,
>               .ops = &gen9_dc_off_power_well_ops,
> -             .id = DISP_PW_ID_NONE,
> +             .id = TGL_DISP_DC_OFF,

Let's assign this ID on all platforms for consistency.

>       },
>       {
>               .name = "power well 2",
> @@ -4039,6 +4109,7 @@ int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>       dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask =
>               get_allowed_dc_mask(dev_priv, i915_modparams.enable_dc);
>  
> +     dev_priv->csr.max_dc_state = DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5_DC6_MASK;
>       BUILD_BUG_ON(POWER_DOMAIN_NUM > 64);
>  
>       mutex_init(&power_domains->lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> index 737b5def7fc6..69ebde992342 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ enum i915_power_well_id {
>       SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO,
>       SKL_DISP_PW_1,
>       SKL_DISP_PW_2,
> +     TGL_DISP_DC_OFF,
>  };
>  
>  #define POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe) + POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A)
> @@ -256,6 +257,8 @@ void intel_display_power_suspend_late(struct 
> drm_i915_private *i915);
>  void intel_display_power_resume_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>  void intel_display_power_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>  void intel_display_power_resume(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +void tgl_set_target_dc_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 state,
> +                          bool psr2_deep_sleep);
>  
>  const char *
>  intel_display_power_domain_str(enum intel_display_power_domain domain);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index db7480831e52..999da5d2da0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ struct intel_csr {
>       i915_reg_t mmioaddr[20];
>       u32 mmiodata[20];
>       u32 dc_state;
> +     u32 max_dc_state;
>       u32 allowed_dc_mask;
>       intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  };
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to