Op 17-10-2019 om 15:37 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:20:52PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Instead of unconditionally verifying the cursor plane, handle it in the
>> same way as any other plane, and use our existing api to verify.
>>
>> While at it, ensure that on gen9+ we verify active_planes mask as well.
>> This should give the correct results for planar YUV planes too, as we
>> update active_planes for them.
> Why is that hidden in the watermark verification code? We already have
> intel_verify_planes() which seems like a better fit.
Wasn't aware of it, mostly.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to