On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:22:26PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > At the moment, these values are wiped out anyway by the rps > enable/disable. That will be changed in the next patch though. > > v2: Add post install setup to address issue found by Damien in the next > patch. > replaced > WARN_ON(dev_priv->rps.pm_iir != 0); > with rps.pm_iir = 0; > > With the v2 of this patch and the deferred pm enabling (which changed > since the original patches) we're now able to get PM interrupts before > we've brought up enabled rps. At this point in boot, we don't want to do > anything about it, so we simply ignore it. Since writing the original > assertion, the code has changed quite a bit, and I believe removing this > assertion is perfectly safe. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com> -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
