While not good behaviour, it is, however, established behaviour that we
can punt EAGAIN to userspace if we need to retry the ioctl. When trying
to acquire a mutex, prefer to use EAGAIN to propagate losing the race
so that if it does end up back in userspace, we try again.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/800
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c      | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c
index 038e05a6336c..d71aafb66d6e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ int intel_timeline_read_hwsp(struct i915_request *from,
 
        GEM_BUG_ON(rcu_access_pointer(to->timeline) == tl);
 
-       err = -EBUSY;
+       err = -EAGAIN;
        if (mutex_trylock(&tl->mutex)) {
                struct intel_timeline_cacheline *cl = from->hwsp_cacheline;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 51bb8a0812a1..fb8738987aeb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ i915_request_await_start(struct i915_request *rq, struct 
i915_request *signal)
        if (!tl) /* already started or maybe even completed */
                return 0;
 
-       fence = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+       fence = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
        if (mutex_trylock(&tl->mutex)) {
                fence = NULL;
                if (!i915_request_started(signal) &&
-- 
2.24.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to