On 12/12/19 11:28 PM, Manasi Navare wrote:
The KBL failure does not look related to the changes in this patch series.
Tomi, could you confirm if this is a false negative?

Manasi

The failures with the patchset seem same as all the other results from live_gt_pm: just that kbl-x1275 hasn't been ticked to the bugfilter, probably because it hasn't survived the test before (module_reload).

I've triggered shard-run for this series.

Tomi

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 02:46:49AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [1/2] drm: Handle connector tile support only for 
modes that match tile size
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70790/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7545 -> Patchwork_15701
====================================================

Summary
-------

   **FAILURE**

   External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/index.html

Possible new issues
-------------------

   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_15701:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

   * igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_pm:
     - fi-kbl-x1275:       NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][1]
    [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_pm.html


== Logs ==

For more details see: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/index.html


--
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to