It is highly unlikely, but still conceivable, that we submit a context
with the same GGTT address as last active on the HW. In this case, with
a matching LRCA, the HW would not restore the new context image causing
a potential violation of our context isolation.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index f6174e597dd3..5ccc8a3538ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -2583,7 +2583,7 @@ __execlists_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce,
                goto unpin_active;
        }
 
-       ce->lrc_desc = lrc_descriptor(ce, engine);
+       ce->lrc_desc = lrc_descriptor(ce, engine) | CTX_DESC_FORCE_RESTORE;
        ce->lrc_reg_state = vaddr + LRC_STATE_PN * PAGE_SIZE;
        __execlists_update_reg_state(ce, engine);
 
-- 
2.25.0.rc1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to