On 14/02/20 11:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
Set up a custom engine map with no engines, and check that the
for_each_context_engine() correctly iterates over nothing.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
  tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c
index 063140e0f..6a2edd1e0 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_engines.c
@@ -549,6 +549,31 @@ static void independent(int i915)
        gem_context_destroy(i915, param.ctx_id);
  }
+static void libapi(int i915)
+{
+       struct i915_context_param_engines engines = {};

Is there a case for invalid engines as well?

Acked-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenzi...@intel.com>

+       struct drm_i915_gem_context_param p = {
+               .ctx_id = gem_context_create(i915),
+               .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES,
+               .value = to_user_pointer(&engines),
+               .size = sizeof(engines),
+       };
+       const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
+       unsigned int count = 0;
+
+       gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
+
+       for_each_context_engine(i915, p.ctx_id, e)
+               count++;
+       igt_assert_eq(count, 0);
+
+       ____for_each_physical_engine(i915, p.ctx_id, e)
+               count++;
+       igt_assert_eq(count, 0);
+
+       gem_context_destroy(i915, p.ctx_id);
+}
+
  igt_main
  {
        int i915 = -1;
@@ -584,6 +609,9 @@ igt_main
        igt_subtest("independent")
                independent(i915);
+ igt_subtest("libapi")
+               libapi(i915);
+
        igt_fixture
                igt_stop_hang_detector();
  }

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to