On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 11:33:02 +0100 Toralf Foerster wrote:
> On 2/16/20 4:26 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > Looks like a stray lock counts for the above NULL dereference.
> >
> Hi, the patch applied on top of 5.5.4 breaks the internal display now even
> in the boot phase.
My bad.
Then try to do fence signaling before taking request's lock as we'll
take the fence specific lock if we're in the right direction.
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -252,10 +252,10 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_req
*/
remove_from_engine(rq);
+ dma_fence_signal(&rq->fence);
+
spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
- if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
- dma_fence_signal_locked(&rq->fence);
if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, &rq->fence.flags))
i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(rq);
if (i915_request_has_waitboost(rq)) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
