On 17/03/2020 00:16, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:05:01 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>
The only bit of the status register we currently report in the
i915-perf stream is the "report loss" bit. Only report this when we
have some data to report with it. There was a kind of inconsistency
here in that we could report report loss without appending the reports
associated with the loss.
Splitting hair a bit, but I am wondering if this is realistic? If reports
have been lost in the middle of a OA buffer then there /will/ be some data
from the hardware so head != tail. So is the situation which this patch is
fixing ever been observed in practice?
Also, if we are doing this, how about moving the entire status handling
here, including intel_uncore_read() and OABUFFER_OVERFLOW handling (which I
understand resets the stream so probably doesn't have associated data).
In any case, since these are just random questions, this is:
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.di...@intel.com>
For some reason I thought this writing of lost report was inconsistent.
But it's fairly unrelated to this series.
Maybe drop this patch...
-Lionel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
